Curt Levey |
In a front page story in the Washington
Post today, Alliance for Justice President Nan Aron, among others, discusses the progress made toward a
more diverse judiciary under President Obama. The story also
included Coalition for Justice President Curt Levey’s shameful insinuation
that the Administration might have “a lower threshold of qualifications for
minorities.” Not only does Levey’s sentiment mirror Supreme Court Justice
Antonin Scalia’s notorious “racial
entitlement” language last week in the Voting Rights Act oral argument, it
is outright false.
Each and every federal court nominee put forward under
President Obama – whether a white male or an African-American woman – has been
rated qualified or well-qualified to serve as a federal judge by the American
Bar Association. And rather than facing a “lower threshold,” a study by University of Rochester professor
Maya Sen shows that the ABA
systematically holds women and minorities to a higher standard than
white men. In other words, with all other objective qualifications equal, the
ABA has given harsher ratings to women and minorities than to their otherwise
identical white male counterparts.
The
facts clearly reflect that President Obama’s movement toward a judiciary that
more closely resembles America has brought both diverse and exceptional
nominees to a Senate which has delayed far too long in confirming them. Levey’s
insulting accusation is an affront to the nominees, to the president, and to
the American people, who have long since moved past these sorts of racial
canards.
Read
more about President Obama’s federal court nominees and impact on the
judiciary.
No comments:
Post a Comment