WE'VE MOVED!


As part of our big, new redesign of the Alliance for Justice website, the Justice Watch blog has moved. To be sure you're getting all the latest news about the fight for a fairer America, visit us at www.afj.org/blog

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

The Myth of Defensive Medicine

Are doctors overloading patients with unnecessary tests to avoid possible malpractice claims, and driving up the cost of medical care as a result? Is the solution to limit the ability of patients who are victims of medical errors to hold doctors and hospitals accountable for their mistakes?

First of all, while some doctors may order unnecessary tests as a result of a variety of motives, studies do not show that so-called “defensive medicine” is a widespread or significant phenomenon.

A Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report released October 9, 2009, found that there is no evidence of defensive medicine in private managed care systems, yet there is evidence of over-testing among Medicare patients. Patients in those two sectors are both covered by the same malpractice laws, so the comparison makes it clear that the solution to over-testing is not to take away victims’ legal rights but to manage medical charges more effectively.

The most common limit on victims’ rights – limiting joint and several liability, which has been enacted in at least 40 states – actually drives up costs because it “may increase the volume and intensity” of physician services.

The CBO report notes that “Imposing limits on [the right to sue for damages] might be expected to have a negative impact on health outcomes.” CBO cites a study that finds that restricting the right to seek compensation for malpractice would lead to a .2 percent increase in the nation’s overall death rate. That means an additional 48,000 Americans killed and more than 400,000 injured by medical malpractice over the next ten years.

Even if all the possible limits and restrictions on malpractice liability were enacted, the savings would represent only half a percent of the nation’s health care costs. That figure does not actually represent a “net” savings, of course, because the report does not quantify the added costs created by removing an important incentive to provide safe care.

The facts are clear. Limiting or severely restricting the ability to file a claim in court for medical malpractice denies justice to injured individuals while benefiting big corporations' balance sheets.

To learn the facts about the medical malpractice liability debate, see AFJ’s fact sheets and report on health care courts, and a fact sheet from the Center on Justice and Democracy on the CBO report.

5 comments:

Dean said...

greetings to all.
I would first like to thank the writers of this blog by sharing information, a few years ago I read a book called Real Estate Investment costa rica in this book deal with questions like this one.

niz said...

Hello .. firstly I would like to send greetings to all readers. After this, I recognize the content so interesting about this article. For me personally I liked all the information. I would like to know of cases like this more often. In my personal experience I might mention a book called Generic Viagra in this book that I mentioned have very interesting topics, and also you have much to do with the main theme of this article.

Chad said...

Costa Rica is a country of beautiful landscapes, beaches and lush variety of plant and animal species. Visit


In Costa Rica will always find a variety of animals and plants that beautify our landscape. Come and see the beauty of our land
costa rica real estate

Chad said...

The people of Costa Rica is warm in his dealings, kind and hardworking. Visit our country and will enjoy the natural beauty of the find


When you want to know a country full of beautiful natural landscapes come to Costa Rica, a place of beauty in every way, come and visit our land, you'll easily fall in love with Costa Rica
costa rica investment

Medical Negligence Claim (Australia) said...

As a clinical negligence lawyer really appreciate the insight on defensive medicine. Keep up the good work.