As part of our big, new redesign of the Alliance for Justice website, the Justice Watch blog has moved. To be sure you're getting all the latest news about the fight for a fairer America, visit us at www.afj.org/blog

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Cardinal Newman Opposes Breyer Award

New York’s Fordham University has found itself at the center of some controversy lately surrounding its decision to honor Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer with the Fordham-Stein Ethics Prize. The award is meant to honor those “whose work exemplifies outstanding standards of professional conduct” and “promotes the advancement of justice.” But according to Cardinal Newman Society President Patrick Reilly, who is also a graduate of Fordham, Justice Breyer’s support for abortion rights makes him an unsuitable candidate for the prize.

Mr. Reilly has gathered over a thousand signatures calling for the award to be rescinded, claiming that giving it to someone who is so staunchly pro-choice is an “affront” to the Church’s teachings. And Fordham University is after all, a Catholic university. Still, some question why Justice Breyer is being singled out when former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and current Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, both supporters of abortion rights, also received the award with little if any opposition. Mr. Reilly simply dismisses the inconsistency by saying that those awards must not have been brought to the society’s attention.

Not to worry though, Mr. Reilly’s particular brand of orthodoxy is equal-opportunity. It seems that Boston College’s decision to host an event that featured Sen. John McCain’s daughter, Meghan, was also inappropriate in his view. Despite the fact that Sen. McCain has a strong record of opposition to abortion, it seems his support for stem-cell research is enough to disqualify him from any recognition by Catholic universities. Still, we can’t help but wonder: if Mr. Reilly would limit his list of potential honorees so strictly, would there really be anyone left to recognize?


Richard Attanasio said...

Mr. Reilly needs to learn to separate his religious convictions from our country's political positions. He needs to have the same respect for other Americans' beliefs as he has for his own. Most Americans do not equate the conceived fetus with a human being. Even more Americans believe and hope that stem cell research can give hope for alleviating terrible diseases, for example Parkinson's and cancer.

Mr. Reilly needs to consider the implications for his immortal soul, for the culpable wrongs he is doing if his non-negotiable commitment to his beliefs is wrong, to the human suffering that follows from unwanted births and unalleviated diseases.

kanawah said...

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer is a very good nominee for the award.

Abortion is the woman's decision. If she so wishes, she may invite others to participate in that decision, but in the end, she does not have to ask for anyone's input.

The government has no other business than to make sure the woman is protected from dissenters and incompetent doctors, who could hurt the woman.