As part of our big, new redesign of the Alliance for Justice website, the Justice Watch blog has moved. To be sure you're getting all the latest news about the fight for a fairer America, visit us at www.afj.org/blog

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Senator Needs a Civics Lesson

Following criticism by fellow conservatives and members of his own party, Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) has lifted his hold on Michigan district court nominee Janet T. Neff. As you recall, Senator Brownback had blocked the nomination because Neff had attended a same-sex commitment ceremony in 2002. If the President renominates Neff in January, Senator Brownback has said he wants to have a second hearing on her nomination so he can re-question her, but he is “not opposed to her getting a vote.” The latest development in this continuing saga is an about-face for the Kansas senator. Right before the 109th Congress adjourned, Senator Brownback had said he would lift his hold on Neff—which effectively held up more than a dozen other nominees who were part of a bipartisan compromise package—but only if Neff promised to recuse herself from all cases involving same-sex unions.

This encroachment on judicial independence created uproar across the political spectrum. In a New York Times article, conservative Harvard Law Professor Charles Fried pointed out the absurdity of Senator Brownback's position: "[P]eople go to parties for all sorts of reasons,” Professor Fried said, and how one would rule on a case should not be inferred from that private activity. (In fact, Neff has publicly stated that she attended the commitment ceremony because one of the women in the ceremony was a close friend to her and her own daughters.) Further, Professor Fried observed, “It would be inappropriate for the judge to recuse herself from any such case because it is a judge’s duty to sit on cases,” unless there is a clear conflict of interest. Senator Brownback now pleads naiveté as an excuse for his earlier stance, claiming, according to the New York Times, that "he did not realize his proposal — asking a nominee to agree in advance to remove herself from deciding a whole category of cases — was so unusual as to be possibly unprecedented."

It looks like Senator Brownback has finally ceased his political grandstanding—but not before giving us a pretty good look at how some Republicans see judicial nominations as just another way to score points with the party base.

No comments: