tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3490776317263268706.post4462265799374809557..comments2023-11-05T04:54:51.462-05:00Comments on Justice Watch: Federalist Society Perpetuates Liberal Judiciary MythAlliance for Justicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10189535173876654505noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3490776317263268706.post-85907888586999866632008-11-01T01:07:00.000-04:002008-11-01T01:07:00.000-04:00Deliberate lies, anti=-conceptual appearance-level...Deliberate lies, anti=-conceptual appearance-level bigotries, and deliberately false conclusion mongering are dangerous practices where a Constitution is concerned. How much more so is this true where the entire philosophy of American liberalism versus neocon Republican neo-fascism is concerned. Liberal as a concept means "Concerned with the rights and freedoms of the individual as opposed to any collective". (Dictionary meaning., What could be clearer than that this is what our Founding Fathers intended? They had no agenda at the outset except to stand against infallibility-spouting pseudo-theocratic rule by a monarch.<BR/> Now we have a government of those who suppress rights, kill regulations and preach infallible leader pseudo-theocratic public-interest "lawmaking" (read dictate annunciating)--and dare to call such attitudes "patriotic, American, moral, ethical and legal. How disgusting, treasonable and absurd. Want to know where their idea of 'citizenship" leads? Their majority on the Supreme Court spelled this out less than three montths since. "Quote" "Single party complainants have no standing in the courts". This means the individual citizen, one who claims that a boss in the former marketplace of work and the attainment of idea-level leadership through realism now has no rights unless he/she commits professional suicide by joining a class action lawsuit requiring years, millions of dollars and ending in ostracism for the victim who dared complain in a line of work or industry against those committing acts of favoritism, injustice, bigotry, harassment, unequal pay, slander, misrepresentation, unprofessionalism, vindictive or coercive or fraudulent actions. Our legal bureaucracy like the ideas of our so-called liberal media are 85% neocon neo-fascist pro-=imperial presidency and tyrannical Eastblishment-over-the wage-slaves ideas. Simple proof: name a single movie since "American President" (1994) whose subject is a self-responsible moral-ethical; normative achieving anything by means of personal characteristics. It's called liberalism, stupid. And if there were such a bias, wouldn't someone be writing about it? If liberalism in law existed, wouldn't there be a trend toward regulating and defining individual rights into existence instead of their continual destruction for over 60 years? Grow up. We have to rid ourselves of these whining, pathologically lying excuse-making would-be tyrants or we can never apply science to the 3 marketplaces Madisonian of ideas and related actions in goods and services, work and idea-level leadership, elected and appointed government position gaining. Pretending that we have individual rights where zero exist is insane. Professing individual liberty exists and responsibility can be applied in such situation utter totalitarian nonsense, the opposite of conceptual truth. As a political idea of dictate-making preposterousness it is viciously immoral, unethical and pointless.<BR/>What a disgusting episode in an lifetime of mental increasing U.S. mental degeneracy. Next these lunatic arguments will be telling us that our media are liberal just because their weak-minded and idea-poor CEOs and slaves hate neocon fascists.<BR/>Anyone ever hear of collaborators, running dogs, apologists, fifth columnists, cowardly abettors,<BR/>frightened collaborator victims, willing slaves, deluded followers, "true believers", dupes, etc.?<BR/>Look around you. How many after the AIG disaster and Exxon=Mobil balance sheet profit for doing nothing at all are calling for a curb on CEO theft, corruption and totalitarianism? there's your answer. A house divided against itself cannot stand; minds of this inadequate caliber are those<BR/>who need to be confronted with the enormity of the guilt, and the cost of their Mccarthyist lying, false accusations and patrio-pathological criminal claims against honest responsible American citizens.Robert C.https://www.blogger.com/profile/13731066303163893834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3490776317263268706.post-33206286459043638172008-11-01T01:05:00.000-04:002008-11-01T01:05:00.000-04:00Deliberate lies, anti=-conceptual appearance-level...Deliberate lies, anti=-conceptual appearance-level bigotries, and deliberately false conclusion mongering are dangerous practices where a Constitution is concerned. How much more so is this true where the entire philosophy of American liberalism versus neocon Republican neo-fascism is concerned. Liberal as a concept means "Concerned with the rights and freedoms of the individual as opposed to any collective". (Dictionary meaning., What could be clearer than that this is what our Founding Fathers intended? They had no agenda at the outset except to stand against infallibility-spouting pseudo-theocratic rule by a monarch.<BR/> Now we have a government of those who suppress rights, kill regulations and preach infallible leader pseudo-theocratic public-interest "lawmaking" (read dictate annunciating)--and dare to call such attitudes "patriotic, American, moral, ethical and legal. How disgusting, treasonable and absurd. Want to know where their idea of 'citizenship" leads? Their majority on the Supreme Court spelled this out less than three montths since. "Quote" "Single party complainants have no standing in the courts". This means the individual citizen, one who claims that a boss in the former marketplace of work and the attainment of idea-level leadership through realism now has no rights unless he/she commits professional suicide by joining a class action lawsuit requiring years, millions of dollars and ending in ostracism for the victim who dared complain in a line of work or industry against those committing acts of favoritism, injustice, bigotry, harassment, unequal pay, slander, misrepresentation, unprofessionalism, vindictive or coercive or fraudulent actions. Our legal bureaucracy like the ideas of our so-called liberal media are 85% neocon neo-fascist pro-=imperial presidency and tyrannical Eastblishment-over-the wage-slaves ideas. Simple proof: name a single movie since "American President" (1994) whose subject is a self-responsible moral-ethical; normative achieving anything by means of personal characteristics. It's called liberalism, stupid. And if there were such a bias, wouldn't someone be writing about it? If liberalism in law existed, wouldn't there be a trend toward regulating and defining individual rights into existence instead of their continual destruction for over 60 years? Grow up. We have to rid ourselves of these whining, pathologically lying excuse-making would-be tyrants or we can never apply science to the 3 marketplaces Madisonian of ideas and related actions in goods and services, work and idea-level leadership, elected and appointed government position gaining. Pretending that we have individual rights where zero exist is insane. Professing individual liberty exists and responsibility can be applied in such situation utter totalitarian nonsense, the opposite of conceptual truth. As a political idea of dictate-making preposterousness it is viciously immoral, unethical and pointless.<BR/>What a disgusting episode in an lifetime of mental increasing U.S. mental degeneracy. Next these lunatic arguments will be telling us that our media are liberal just because their weak-minded and idea-poor CEOs and slaves hate neocon fascists.<BR/>Anyone ever hear of collaborators, running dogs, apologists, fifth columnists, cowardly abettors,<BR/>frightened collaborator victims, willing slaves, deluded followers, "true believers", dupes, etc.?<BR/>Look around you. How many after the AIG disaster and Exxon=Mobil balance sheet profit for doing nothing at all are calling for a curb on CEO theft, corruption and totalitarianism? there's your answer. A house divided against itself cannot stand; minds of this inadequate caliber are those<BR/>who need to be confronted with the enormity of the guilt, and the cost of their Mccarthyist lying, false accusations and patrio-pathological criminal claims against honest responsible American citizens.Robert C.https://www.blogger.com/profile/13731066303163893834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3490776317263268706.post-42215804549407205362008-10-31T21:07:00.000-04:002008-10-31T21:07:00.000-04:00The judiciary is not going ‘liberal’ (although I w...The judiciary is not going ‘liberal’ (although I wish it was). It is in fact falling down conservative. Hopefully, Obama will be our next president, and he the opportunity to appoint MANY justices.<BR/><BR/>With Obama’s help, WE THE PEOPLE will retake our government. The executive, the legislative, and the judiciary. They all must be liberal, for the good of the nation.kanawahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06594003889744074872noreply@blogger.com